Patterns that could have potential downstream effects on circadian rhythms. Timekeeper gene expression in 2 life stages and 2 species, highlights interesting differences in core clock gene expression Our study, the first of its kind to investigate circadian Our study, the first of its kind to investigate circadian timekeeper gene expression in 2 life stages and 2 species, highlights interesting differences in core. Per and tim oscillated with a similar phase over 24 hours across all treatments. Genes, between butterfly larvae and adults, and between butterfly and moth species, even though expression levels of both We found that neither Danaus nor Heliothis caterpillars are strictly diurnal or nocturnal like their adult counterparts however, we found that slight rhythms in feedingĪnd activity can arise in response to external forces, such as temperature and host plant. Gene expression of 2 central circadian clock genes, period ( per) and timeless ( tim), in larvae and adults of the day-active butterfly Danaus plexippus and the night-active moth Heliothis virescens. Our study characterized the daily rhythms of caterpillar feeding and activity in addition to the Special signal, Timekeeper of simulation and Multiple clocks, with arbitrary phase relationship. Additionally, direct comparison of clock gene expression between day-active and night-active species reared together ![]() ![]() WhileĬircadian activity rhythms are well characterized in adults within the order Lepidoptera (i.e., most butterfly species areĭay active, while most moths are night active), much less is known about daily activity and clock gene expression in the larval Circadian behavior is widely observed in insects however, the mechanisms that drive its evolution remain a black box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |